TDLR Disciplinary Process Explained for Electricians, HVAC and Elevator Technicians

I’m Pat Ruzzo, and I have been a criminal defense attorney based in Houston, Texas for over thirty-five years. During my career, I have represented numerous electricians, HVAC technicians, elevator mechanics, and other licensed tradespeople in disciplinary proceedings before the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation. What I have learned is that the TDLR disciplinary process is thorough, moves quickly when public safety concerns are present, and has enforcement powers that can affect your ability to work immediately and without prior notice in serious cases.

Understanding how this process works from the beginning gives you the best chance of protecting your license and your livelihood.

Why the TDLR Enforces Its Rules Aggressively

---

Before walking through the disciplinary process, it helps to understand why the TDLR takes enforcement as seriously as it does.

Electricians, HVAC technicians, and elevator mechanics work on systems that present immediate and serious risks to life and property when they malfunction or are installed improperly. Faulty electrical work causes fires. Improperly installed HVAC equipment can cause carbon monoxide poisoning. Elevator and escalator malfunctions can cause serious injury or death.

Because of these risks, the TDLR possesses extraordinary enforcement mechanisms, including the ability to halt work immediately through emergency cease and desist orders, to red-tag and remove equipment from service without prior notice, and to refer persistent violators to the Texas Attorney General or local prosecutors for civil and criminal action.

This context matters because it explains why TDLR investigators approach their work seriously, why the board acts quickly when public safety is at stake, and why having experienced legal representation from the very beginning of any TDLR investigation is so important.

The TDLR disciplinary process begins when a complaint is filed. Complaints reach the TDLR from several sources:

Customers and property owners who are dissatisfied with work performed, believe work was done improperly or dangerously, or who have suffered property damage as a result of electrical, HVAC, or elevator work.

Municipal inspectors and building code officials who encounter unpermitted work, code violations, or dangerous installations during the course of their inspections and report the matter to the TDLR.

The TDLR’s centralized enforcement division through its own monitoring activities, routine inspections, and follow-up on prior violations.

Law enforcement when criminal conduct intersects with trade work.

Competitors who observe violations by other license holders and report them to the TDLR.

Self-reporting at renewal when disclosure requirements at license renewal reveal issues that trigger investigation.

Once a complaint is filed, the TDLR’s centralized enforcement division opens an investigation.

Stage 1: The Investigation

TDLR investigators gather evidence relevant to the complaint. Depending on the nature of the allegations, the investigation may include:

• Reviewing contract documents and permit records
• Obtaining municipal inspection records
• Reviewing general contractor records if a general contractor was involved
• Examining the work in question when possible
• Interviewing the customer or property owner
• Interviewing workers who performed the work
• Interviewing other contractors or professionals on the job site
• Gathering any other evidence relevant to the alleged violations

TDLR investigators are experienced and thorough. By the time they send a formal notice, they have typically already built a substantial evidentiary record. Do not assume the investigation is at an early stage simply because you have not yet received formal notice.

Stage 2: Notice of Alleged Violation

If the investigation reveals evidence of violations, the TDLR sends a Notice of Alleged Violation, commonly called a NOAV. This document sets forth:

• The specific violations alleged against you
• The proposed administrative sanctions
• Your rights and the procedures for contesting the allegations

Receiving a NOAV is serious. Read it carefully, but do not respond to it or contact the TDLR without first consulting an attorney. What seems like a straightforward explanation can easily become an admission of additional violations or waiver of important rights.

One important point about proposed sanctions in the NOAV: for certain violations, particularly Class D violations, the penalties are mandatory and not subject to negotiation. For other violations, there may be room to negotiate the proposed sanctions. Knowing which is which before you decide how to respond is essential, and that knowledge requires experience with TDLR proceedings.

Stage 3: Your Response and Independent Investigation

After receiving the NOAV, you have the right to contest the allegations. If you retain legal counsel, your attorney will:

Review all evidence the TDLR has gathered to assess the strength of the board’s case and identify weaknesses or inaccuracies.

Conduct an independent investigation. I work with licensed private investigators who can gather additional evidence, interview witnesses, obtain records, and document facts that support your position. An independent investigation sometimes reveals evidence that contradicts the board’s findings, explains the circumstances in a more favorable light, or identifies mitigating factors the TDLR’s investigators did not consider.

Identify opportunities to mitigate before formal proceedings advance. If there are steps you can take to make affected customers whole, remediate deficient work, or correct violations, taking those steps quickly demonstrates good faith and is considered a mitigating factor that can influence sanctions favorably.

Reach out to the TDLR to negotiate. For violations where negotiation is possible, your attorney will contact the TDLR to discuss potential resolutions short of the maximum proposed sanctions.

Possible negotiated outcomes include:

• Reduced fines for violations where reduction is permitted
• Continuing education requirements in lieu of or in addition to reduced fines
• Agreed probationary periods with specified conditions
• Agreed orders that resolve the matter without proceeding to formal hearing

Stage 4: Informal Conference

In many cases, there is an opportunity to participate in an informal conference with TDLR representatives before the matter proceeds to a formal hearing. The informal conference serves several purposes:

• You learn what evidence the TDLR has and how strong they believe their case is
• You can present your side of the story through your attorney
• You can submit evidence and documentation supporting your position
• You can attempt to negotiate a resolution acceptable to both sides

The informal conference is often the best opportunity to resolve a matter without proceeding to formal hearing. If an agreement is reached, the parties enter into an agreed order.

Stage 5: Formal Hearing at the State Office of Administrative Hearings

If the matter cannot be resolved through negotiation or informal conference, it proceeds to a formal hearing at the State Office of Administrative Hearings, commonly referred to as SOAH. An administrative law judge presides over the hearing.

The formal hearing operates similarly to a civil trial:

• Both sides present evidence
• Witnesses testify and are subject to cross-examination
• Documents and other evidence are formally admitted into the record
• Legal arguments are made about what the evidence shows and what sanctions are appropriate

After the hearing, the administrative law judge issues a Proposal for Decision containing findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended sanctions. The TDLR then reviews the Proposal for Decision and issues its final disciplinary order.

A critical strategic consideration: Proceeding to a formal SOAH hearing carries risk. If the administrative law judge finds against you, the resulting sanctions may be more severe than what was proposed in the NOAV or offered during negotiation. The decision to fight a case to formal hearing versus accepting a negotiated resolution is one of the most consequential choices you will make, and it requires experienced legal counsel to evaluate properly.

All final disciplinary orders are published in the TDLR public disciplinary action database, which is freely accessible to the public. Homeowners, general contractors, building owners, and businesses who check license histories before hiring can see your disciplinary record. This public nature of TDLR discipline is another reason why resolving matters at the earliest possible stage, before formal disciplinary actions are entered, is so important.

The TDLR uses a four-tier classification system for violations with corresponding sanction ranges. Understanding where your alleged violations fall in this system is essential to understanding what you face.

Class A Violations

Class A violations are minor administrative and record-keeping infractions that do not involve safety risks or significant consumer harm. Examples include:

• Failing to display compliance certificates on elevators or equipment
• Minor advertising or vehicle labeling defects
• Late updates to contact information with the TDLR

Class A violations typically result in fines ranging from five hundred to one thousand dollars per violation. These are the least serious violations and carry the lowest penalties.

Class B Violations

Class B violations involve operational issues and unlicensed practice. Examples include:

• Operating without adequate general liability insurance coverage
• Employing uncertified or unregistered helpers or apprentices
• Failing to provide required document packages to building owners after elevator or escalator work
• Failing to properly supervise job sites

Class B violations can result in fines ranging from one thousand to three thousand dollars per violation and may result in a probated suspension of up to one year or a full suspension.

Class C Violations

Class C violations involve safety risks, gross negligence, and dishonesty. These are serious violations that the TDLR treats accordingly. Examples include:

• Substandard or negligent work that violates national safety codes such as the National Electrical Code or ASME standards
• Working on a suspended license
• Returning compromised elevator or escalator equipment to service after an accident without proper replacement or repair
• Fraud or misrepresentation in connection with work performed

Class C violations can result in fines ranging from two thousand to five thousand dollars per violation and may result in a one-year probated suspension up to full revocation of your license.

Class D Violations

Class D violations are the most serious category and carry mandatory maximum penalties including fines of up to five thousand dollars per violation and immediate license revocation. There is no negotiation available for Class D violations. Examples include:

• Violating a previous TDLR commission order
• Obtaining a license through fraud or cheating on a licensing examination
• Falsifying safety reports submitted to the state
• Refusing to cooperate with a TDLR investigation

If you are facing allegations that fall into the Class D category, understanding immediately that the penalties are mandatory and non-negotiable is essential to making informed decisions about how to proceed.

Beyond the classification system, it helps to understand the full range of sanctions available to the TDLR:

Administrative Fines

Monetary penalties ranging from five hundred to five thousand dollars per violation per day depending on the classification of the violation. For unlicensed activity, fines can reach up to five thousand dollars per violation per day.

Official Reprimand

A formal written reprimand that becomes part of your permanent public license record. Your license remains active, but the reprimand is visible to anyone who checks your license history and acts as a red flag in any future disciplinary proceedings.

License Probation

A probationary period during which your license remains active but you must comply with specified conditions. Probation conditions can include:

• Additional continuing professional education hours
• Unannounced job site audits by TDLR compliance officers
• Regular submission of job logs to TDLR compliance officers
• Restricted practice parameters limiting certain types of work or supervisory authority

License Suspension

Suspension of your license for a specified period during which you cannot legally work in your licensed trade. Suspension can range from thirty days to two years for standard suspensions.

Emergency Cease and Desist Orders

The TDLR executive director has the authority to issue emergency cease and desist orders halting unpermitted electrical, HVAC, or elevator work on site immediately. These orders can be issued without prior notice when unpermitted work is discovered. Work stops immediately, regardless of where the project stands.

Emergency Red-Tagging of Equipment

For elevator and escalator work specifically, the TDLR can emergency red-tag equipment and remove it from service when an inspection reveals an immediate physical safety hazard. This action can occur without prior notice and without a hearing. The consequences for an elevator contractor when a commercial elevator is red-tagged can be immediate and severe.

License Revocation

Revocation is the most serious sanction and results in complete termination of your license. Unlike suspension, where your license is restored after the suspension period ends, revocation means you must reapply for your license after a specified waiting period and, in many cases, retake licensing examinations.

Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

---

When determining appropriate sanctions, the TDLR considers both aggravating and mitigating factors:

Aggravating factors that can result in harsher sanctions include:

• Physical harm to a person
• Environmental risk or significant property damage
• Financial loss to a consumer beyond mere procedural errors
• History of prior violations
• Willfulness and deception including intentional fraud and misrepresentation
• Economic deterrence, where the board is intentionally setting an example industry-wide

Mitigating factors that can support lesser sanctions include:

• No physical harm occurred
• The violation was technical or procedural rather than intentional
• The license holder voluntarily made restitution to affected customers before the board intervened
• The license holder remediated deficient or dangerous work before the board got involved
• Clean prior record
• Genuine cooperation with the investigation

Acting quickly to make things right before the board is deeply involved in your case is one of the most effective mitigation strategies available. Once a NOAV has been issued and the board is committed to its proposed sanctions, the opportunity to demonstrate pre-enforcement good faith is largely gone.

The TDLR’s emergency enforcement powers deserve special attention because they can affect your ability to work before you have had any opportunity to respond or present your side.

Emergency cease and desist orders can halt work on site immediately when the TDLR discovers unpermitted electrical, HVAC, or elevator work. If you or your workers are performing unpermitted work and a TDLR inspector arrives, work can be stopped on the spot. The financial consequences of having a project shut down mid-completion can be severe.

Emergency red-tagging can remove elevator or escalator equipment from service immediately when an inspection reveals an immediate physical safety hazard. A commercial elevator red-tagged in an office building or apartment complex creates immediate problems for the building owner and immediate professional consequences for the elevator contractor.

Both of these emergency actions can occur without prior notice. The board acts to protect the public first and affords you the opportunity for a hearing afterward. By the time you know there is a problem, your ability to work may already be affected.

This is why having legal counsel you can reach quickly is important. An attorney experienced in TDLR proceedings can help you respond effectively to emergency enforcement actions and work to restore your ability to operate as quickly as possible.

Do not talk to TDLR investigators without an attorney. Investigators are experienced professionals building a case. What you say is documented and can be used against you. Contact an attorney before making any statements.

Do not ignore the NOAV. The deadlines for responding are real. Ignoring a NOAV can result in default sanctions being imposed without you having had any opportunity to present your position.

Do not assume everything is negotiable. Some sanctions are fixed by rule. Others can be negotiated. You need to know which is which before deciding how to respond, and that requires experience with TDLR proceedings.

Act quickly to mitigate where possible. Making customers whole, remediating deficient work, and correcting violations before formal proceedings are far advanced demonstrates good faith and is considered a mitigating factor.

Hire an attorney with experience in both criminal defense and licensing proceedings if your situation involves criminal charges as well as a TDLR investigation. The two proceedings are happening simultaneously and require coordinated strategy.